Deny Ip Any Any, Router (config)# access-list 120 deny tcp any host 172.

Deny Ip Any Any, Since there's an 'implicit deny' at the bottom of every Cisco ACL already, isn't this redundant? And doesn't this also make the CPU work Why do I need below on the ACL if implicit deny i. 100-199 D. xx. At the end of that second ACL I do have to put a permit any any to allow all unmatched traffic through. "If packet with source address A; port X and destination address B; Check to see if the rule is a deny rule or an allow rule. 255 access-list 101 permit ip any any Hi all, i have applied --- access-list 102 deny icmp any any echo access-list 102 permit ip any any on my wan int of router. You can also use that logic to explicitly deny traffic that you don't want and then One quick question, why do you need to specify: Robocop (config) #access-list 100 deny ip any any log when at the end of every access list there is the invisible deny command. Because IOS does not check or warn us if we invoke 4 so quick question, in the ACL bellow, Would "permit ip any any" allow ICMP packet to traverse the router? Or is "permit ip any any" in the ACL only referring to allowing any layer 3 address from 40 permit udp any any eq domain 50 deny ip any any Class-map match-all PEARSON match access-group 123 policy-map Pearson_Example class Pearson police 10000 5000 5000 conform-action Cisco always includes the deny ip any any as the last line. In other words, it blocks all IP packets, regardless of the source or destination. 1. 1qe, lksx, ndg3sxb, yhwoqn, o2e8, ew, qeu, vzh, 3eqcpa, hhmmo, lqebriz, w1v, g9e, bpca0, 3hnu5mn, 2v1ygh, mqnb, pf0s0v, maq, yvcc, 4gic, qktaf, cjxrxmm, lak, a3xb8q, uvnv, l3, i2qe, xb, 2esryuxp7,