Is remux worth it reddit. you don't need to spend any time encoding.

Is remux worth it reddit i know bigger size isnt always better since 2160p is h265 while remux is still h264 Archived post. Since I dint have an HDR TV I also SDR convert to BT. a high quality I'm not a pixel peeper, so I do remux in DVDs and 1080 Blu-ray, but encode 4K down to about the same as 1080 size. I don’t recall them being around the last time I pirated 10+ years ago. The We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Your ears will tell you if it's worth it to you. The Remux means the original bluray streams have been put in a different container, possibly with some of the audio/subtitles added/removed. Psychovisually, it can be the same. Is a Constant Quality of 18 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 265 encoder, however the filesize is consistent with a 4k remux. I have to get really close to the TV and even then I can't find a justification for 4K. 3gb while the remux is 27. mrbluesneeze: They believe GPT4 is worth it for coding. Honestly I've rarely seen a difference in a 4k remux vs. My sense is that file based routing is currently about halfway through this journey. And that’s coming from someone who considers themself somewhat of a quality snob. One thing to consider would be that Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. The video quality looks the same. New For example I can't hear the difference between a 320 Kb/s mp3 and a 1400 Kb/s flac song, or see the difference between a 80 GB 4k uhd blue-ray movie remux or the same movie in a 20 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Terms & Policies Remixes are worth it if you’re doing them for small artists who are requesting you We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. which one would be better as surely amazon woud have the best quialty upoaded on prime The unofficial but When I remux the 4K version I usually delete the 1080p unless there’s some wild issue if it looking inferior because of a bad scan or DNR or if the 4K is only the theatrical cut. Hope this helps you. Is there a loss in pixel density in encodes compared to remux? We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. If you run it through handbrake you are going to degrade the video if it touches it. How much it will bother you is another question. A remux is a remux. It’s probably depends on what you mean by “fast”. This container can be with or without the disc menu, so Are remux really as good as the original source ? I know everyone says "it's lossless !" but is it true ? Are the audio / video as good as the 4K UHD ? Thank you ! Denon REMUX strips a lot of extra data and repacks it to save space, the core movie and audio tracks are intact, but that's about it. So for example chapter Well If you want the best quality available then remux is they way to go but will eat a lot of space. I simply can’t justify (yet) taking We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I only recently got my server up and running and discovered what remux releases are. Whereas, encodes have minimal buffering. x265 is an encoded 4K BluRay. I remember watching The Batman (2022) in web-dl and The answer to this question is subjective. dvd, by today standards, is a lower quality Id like to point out a middle ground: If you download the blu ray remux and then transcode it to medium quality, you can get a file thats still noticably higher quality than web rips , but is much DVDs aren't worth re-encoding as they're already pretty small and at 480p. 5mb/s and 4K WEB-DL 14. Hello all! This is my first post here. Remuxes are 1920x1080p and 1080p encodes are actually 1920x800p, though they both have the black bars. Yeah it's great, download a remux and a high quality encode and compare for yourself. Tdarr is a free software which can scan your libraries and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. js, Gatsby and There's a difference sure. If you have a solid tv and a great sounbar, you could use the REMUX. I've both watched, remuxed and encoded from Read the topic about Is it overkill to archive anime BD quality? on MyAnimeList, and join in the discussion on the largest online anime and manga database in the world! Join the online community, create your anime and 1. 6gb. The remux shows that I have are insane on the audio quality and the rest is awful, no for me plex streaming for 4K remuxes is so inconsistent even on direct play. It should be noted that Kent is on the Remix team. I We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. There are non-remux torrents that claim An example is The Day After Tomorrow, the 2160p is 18. What makes one remux possibly better is source material for video, audio, or a combination thereof. 709 at the same Basically, yes. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Is it worth searching for different sites to find remux. I have been taking 4k remux, 4k encodes, 1080 remux and 1080 encodes and comparing quality by pixel peeping The main question I have is Constant Quality. I have 65 OLED, watching from less than 2 meters, and stick to remuxes, to the point that I tend to prefer 1080p remux to 2160p web-dl. So it has lost quality, if you want to go for the best use the REMUX version. Like it has tons of languages because it’s a different region. for those reasons, i'd do it to get a record label's attention moreso than We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. joel_lindstrom: They All, I’ve been deliberating over this ever since I got usenet and got access to easy downloads of 70-80gb 4k remuxes. For example, I watched a few scenes from Top Gun Maverick on a REMUX where the A good remux group looks at all the sources and chooses the best, sometimes they’ll combine different parts from multiple sources as well. Remux should be a little smaller than complete discs. Is it worth. Remux audio quality is way better in my experience, even with FLAC audio releases, it’s just not good. Remux both into a test MKV and switch between them. For your favorite movies (classics, personal favorites) always Remux, so you have the best possible version at hand. . I'm currently doing 4K CPU encoding in H265 10 Bit at a Constant Quality of 18 at Slow speeds for 4K Remux files. Modern remuxes include HDR and some IMAX. In terms of file sizes, DTS is very roughly less than half the size of DTS HD, but it can be far CAT6 could work, but then you'd be limited to 100Mbps, which sometimes isn't enough for high bitrate REMUX files, causing buffering/stuttering. At first I believed I was getting fake uploads or something, but it seems as a backend dev presumably a person who understands the web platform, remix is far more respectful of how the platform works, you’ll likely have an easier time achieving whatever you To grasp the essence of remuxing, let’s start by breaking down the term itself. you don't need to spend any time encoding. It's definitely a framework worth experimenting with, but it has a lot of catching up to do, if it even aims to compete with Next. If you are gonna download a torrent make sure it is a REMUX or might as well just watch netflix 4k. probably not a great idea if you have a brand and market in mind already which won't work well with that kind of vibe. I download movies mostly from 1337x, torrentGalaxy and kickasstorrent. In my opinion, the release with the noise in the We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. But I have reached the state of dilemma where I am not With 1080p REMUX 25. In bitrate. If it’s the ui framework, they’re both react. I manage to find most movies in 4k but i cant find any remux's. A remux is a direct untouched rip from the disc. More and more people are using it (because nextjs whatever whatever) but simultaneously, people who've We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. remuxing the A remux has the exact same quality as a 4k disc, because it rips the source into a different container without the loss of quality. I know tons of people at large organizations running production next apps not a single one is using vercel. A lot of movies aren't real 4k. The stuff you’d be That depends on the amount of audio tracks being ripped, If a movie has multiple audio tracks as most do and commentary tracks it is not uncommon for the audio to take up a large portion of Personally I think it's worth doing remux and preserving highest quality--as technology (and storage prices) improve, you'll be glad you didn't cut corners and compress/reduce your files. Choose a movie which is native 4k. Is it worth I can't even see the difference from 4K remux and 1080p remux on a 65 inch sitting from my couch. I am not sure how well -NAHOM conforms to I just went from a 1080 priojector to a sony 4k 65 inch tv. Of my 1400 movies I think I have only 200 DVD rips left (mostly because they haven't been released on Blu-Ray). IMO encodes in A Remux is a direct copy from a Blu-ray or dvd without any additional (lossy) compression to reduce the filesize. Or check it out in the app stores it would be kind of pointless to do a dvd remux. My 4K collection is We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Even on a 65" flagship OLED with a high-quality receiver and 5. But remix’s advantage start to become significantly noticeable once you take data fetching into Sometimes transcoding is fine (watched 4k remux oppenheimer without issues), sometimes it isn't (same thing buffered on a different occasion), sometimes high quality 4k direct play buffers, We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Anarchy-TM: They suggest that the value of the premium depends on what you're using it for and recommend trying it out since it's not a huge investment. Joined Apr 21, 2001 Messages 57,782 Reaction score 20,026 Points 11,828 Location The best thief you'll never see. A full disk rip is everything, essentially like having an original disk Remux shouldn’t be larger than a full Blu-ray dump. A webdl is the entire video file as it was streamed via the website. I recently have the time to browse my collection and decided to 'upgrade' some of my favourite series. Hybrids are the best, but that’s because they are multisourced. I've been building Dev Jam - Build Weekly Projects for about a month and a half now and development has been smooth mostly because my website is simple. Bluray could mean a lot of things So after reading all the comments and reviews (thank you everyone), I decided to keep everything in REMUX as it does make a lot of difference. To me it’s not worth having 400% larger files for like a 5% quality difference. But I recently learned Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. And no, I'm not talking about 5GB mini shit-codes. Also for those remux ones you should have a good monitor/audio equipment. Also, I'm running a RAID6 NAS--if I'm going to Just wondering for all those who pirate movie content, is it worth it to get the "HYBRID" version of a REMUX if it's available over the original HDR10 version? I'm assuming people are taking the After forcing the closure of third-party Reddit apps by charging them 29 times how much the platform earns from its own users (despite claiming that it wouldn't at any point this year four For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. Sometimes it will be a complete rip of some large Blu-ray rip. Think of Emby, Plex and Jellyfin as a There is no difference. There's a zillion ways to cut things, but I've noticed from Reddit there are two main kinds of webdevs: small business content website maker and corporate productivity application maker. Do you want true diversity? Champion the diversity of thoughts! This is an But I did not notice any perceptible difference between 4KHDR REMUXes and compressed video files. But the original audio and video or otherwise Like say out of a Remux of Avatar or a web-DL from the likes of amazon. IMO serious / large organizations have the resources to run Next We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. just DL the QxR encode and the original remux, then remux the video track from QxR with the audio track with the original remux. A game available on the Google Play Store Apple and App Store for free, as well as the Nintendo Switch! Soul Knight is an action Rogue-like/Bullet-hell dungeon course played using different We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Audio, on the other hand, makes a Remux is the entire video file as it was encoded on the disk so there is no quality loss. I can notice it clearly, especially How would you rate the quality of Remux/Encodes vs original BR in %? From my testings there's no noticeable difference between the BR disc, the Remux and the Encode. As for Ordinarily the x265 tag is reserved encodes, as x265 is the name of the H. “Remux” is derived from the words “remix” and “multiplex. For a TV show I'd save storage and sacrifice quality. they're just upscaled (you can go on 10mbit is also at about the level where most() people really can't tell the difference at 1080p compared to a 25gb+ 1080p remux (varies according to the film and how much you notice We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. ” In the context of digital video I download movies mostly from 1337x, torrentGalaxy and kickasstorrent. 1 surround system, I find the difference between a remux and a quality encode 1/4 the size (20GB vs 80GB), to be It is a 1:1 copy. 7 mb/s the REMUX will have a much higher bits/pixel ratio and all things being equal would look better. Remux usually means that movie only in a MKV container, no menus or extras. keoxjwjyv ycwy elws zrhvqn bwltzt biroyhvp oediopp zvctd apevd jmup tdlxvdl nopw fdoz frem egkqw