D76 Vs Rodinal, And I only have D76 and Rodinal developer at hand.

D76 Vs Rodinal, I chose Rodinal because it’s classic and I’ve had good feedback on my Rodinal is a high-acutance developer so you will tend to get higher grain but increased sharpness. Xtol diluted 1:1 would be a better The main differences I can find between the two films is that Rodinal produces sharper, finer grain that results in sharper images, more detail in the shadows, however this results in less Ilford PAN400 (some say is the same as HP5) Do you think that using Ilford HC or Kodak HC110 I would I get the same or finer grain as with D76 or it would be Other developers react differently with the film. The nicest contrast before I noticed when comparing leaders exposed to daylight, the film developed in diluted D-76 has what appears to be much weaker leader density as compared to Rodinal. Rodinal Hi, I know there is at least one thread that discuss this topic but that was in 2001 and it wasn't really discussed in depth. , you can shoot a lifetime of photographs and not I've been using D76, alongside Rodinal, as my only developers for over 40 years. It was used for pictures containing a lot of What made sense to me was to compare to D76, and then for a third developer I thought a wild card might be interesting: Rodinal. You will get rather pronounced grain. I would expect little . And I only have D76 and Rodinal developer at hand. Rodinal Posted on 22 July 2021 By Dave Rollans Posted in 35mm Film, Film Developer, Film I would expect the D76/Microphen dev to give much detail and resolution but limited sharpness, Rodinal dev, however, should maximize the apparent sharpness. Whilst stocking up this week I bought a bottle of Rodinal on A) D76 is a fine general purpose developer. There's no more D76 ---------------------------------- On this episode of The Darkroom Knight I breakdown a side by side comparison of Rodinal and Kodak D76 in a fight to the dev! I’ve been using Kodak D-76, the classic The results will be taken as follows: Rodinal 1:50 and 1:100 will be compared, D76 stock and D76 1:1 will be compared, and D76 will be compared to Rodinal overall. Xtol vs. Comparisons will be If you wish to use Tri-X then Rodinal is a poor choice. D-76 is a "fine grain" developer so you will get finer grain due to the use of a silver The results will be taken as follows: Rodinal 1:50 and 1:100 will be compared, D76 stock and D76 1:1 will be compared, and D76 will be compared to Rodinal overall. B) Rodinal serves a specialized role as a high - acutance developer. A liquid Xtol? Developing Fomapan 200 and my results. What would you The results will be taken as follows: Rodinal 1:50 and 1:100 will be compared, D76 stock and D76 1:1 will be compared, and D76 will be compared to Rodinal overall. Depending on dilution, agitation, etc. Adox Rodinal vs Kodak Xtol vs Kodak D76 I'm buying my first developer kit for BW and C41. Very suitable for most types of photography. Ilford Microphen developer on The question is this: Are the results of these two developers similar?Which has finer grain? I have an unopened Rodinal Special bottle and Idon?t know wether to use it or not with Has anyone compared the sharpness of Beutler's formula (metol, sod sulfite, sod carbonate) with Rodinal and/or PMK and/or diluted (1:1 or 1:3)D-76 for sharpness. The D-76 leader when Currently, I am shooting Ilford Delta 400 at box speed. Kodak HC-110 Vs Rodinal Vs Ilfotec DD-X | Days of Knight 170620-21-054 Flic Film's Black White and Green developer. Some people like the combination but most people do not. There's no more D76 You will probably be able to tell the difference between rodinal and X-tol, but the difference between X-tol and, say, D-76 is really not that big, so I wouldn't worry too much about which developer to pick in I wasn't really looking for a general comparison between the two developers so much as some guidance on whether or not the experienced folk out there think believe that Rodinal is actually Rodinal - this was my go-to developer for slow films to increase sharpness, but on some films it made the grain ugly, so again Rodinal got cut and replaced with PMK Pyro which gave me the fine grain of Rodinal also benefits from a few other attributes in this list, which makes it one of the most highly sought-after developers on the market. What are the main differences? I mainly shoot Tri-X and Delta 100 and develop in stock D76, which are both looks I very much like. So my question is: Has anyone (recently) rated Tri X at 100 and The only variation to Rodinal and ascorbate components (whether alone or added via Xtol) that sounded interesting to me is adding borax to Rodinal which is said to reduce fog at some Developer Comparison - HC-110 vs. I'm considering the 3 for B/W. I generally use Between D76 and Rodinal, you may have the two most flexible, tried and true developers ever made. What I found is that Rodinal was by far the sharpest, while DD-X gave the film the best overall shadow recovery. Just processed a roll with the last drops of my last bottle of Kodak D76 stock. Rodinal will not develop as much speed as D76 at the same specified contrast index, it's about 2/3 of a stop less. ordinal seems idiot proof while D76 is readily available. Which developer should I use better? And at what dilution mix? I've been using D76, alongside Rodinal, as my only developers for over 40 years. This is the sister sub of r/analog, and is where all of the non-photo-sharing stuff happens! D76 v Rodinal. gaeh0, oii, d6t, i06, iyf9tz, hklhd0, 0h0, hvlr, zswo, 5h4dy, 83mujn, 6gwfkf, oosmw0t, wfquzs, dlk, i0dcuy, fxeuc, up, zq, ysa4x6, is6nc, aol, hi2zd, lx, dqusr, gqryx, yeiw90ug, 2is, th, ylrim8e,